Cannabis Industry Attorney Concedes D.C. Circuit Challenge Could Reverse Marijuana Rescheduling
"For weeks investors have been told that the legal challenges to marijuana rescheduling were merely procedural speed bumps. Now a respected cannabis industry attorney has acknowledged what MMJ has maintained all along: if the D.C. Circuit reaches the merits, the Schedule III order faces substantial legal risk. Courts decide cases based on law and evidence-not industry wishful thinking," said Duane Boise, CEO of MMJ International Holdings.
WASHINGTON, DC, June 16, 2026 (Newswire.com) - MMJ International Holdings today highlighted a significant development in the ongoing legal challenge to the federal government's marijuana rescheduling order after cannabis industry attorney Jason Adelstone publicly acknowledged that the D.C. Circuit challenge brought by MMJ International Holdings and the National Drug and Alcohol Screening Association (NDASA) presents a substantial threat to the Schedule III rule.
The statement stands in sharp contrast to recent commentary suggesting that the legal challenge is merely a procedural obstacle with little chance of success.
"The significance of this admission cannot be overstated," said Duane Boise, CEO of MMJ International Holdings. "For weeks investors have been told that the legal challenges to marijuana rescheduling were simply speed bumps. Now an attorney who represents cannabis businesses and generally supports reform has acknowledged that if the D.C. Circuit reaches the merits, the Schedule III order faces substantial legal risk."
The litigation challenges the Department of Justice's use of treaty authority under 21 U.S.C. ยง 811(d) to implement marijuana rescheduling and raises questions regarding compliance with the Controlled Substances Act, federal administrative procedures, and the government's legal authority to bypass portions of the rulemaking process.
Adelstone's analysis further acknowledges that the petitioners' reliance on the D.C. Circuit's own precedent in NORML v. DEA may force the court to confront legal questions that extend far beyond marijuana policy.
The challenge also includes declarations from experts addressing public health, regulatory compliance, and competitive injury concerns associated with the federal government's approach to marijuana rescheduling.
MMJ International Holdings has argued that the federal government cannot simultaneously require pharmaceutical developers to spend years navigating FDA and DEA requirements while extending Schedule III benefits to entities that have not followed the same scientific and regulatory pathway.
"This case has never been about opposing science or opposing medical research," Boise added. "It is about ensuring that federal agencies follow the law and that public health decisions are based on evidence, transparency, and equal application of regulatory standards."
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is currently considering motions related to the rescheduling challenge while additional proceedings remain pending.
About MMJ International Holdings
MMJ International Holdings develops pharmaceutical cannabinoid therapies through the FDA and DEA regulatory pathways. The company is advancing investigational treatments for Huntington's disease and multiple sclerosis and has invested more than eight years and over $10 million pursuing federally compliant cannabinoid drug development.
CONTACT:
Madison Hisey
[email protected]
203-231-8583
SOURCE: MMJ International Holdings
Source: MMJ International Holdings
Share:
Tags: 21 USC 811(d), adolescent marijuana use, cannabis appellate court, cannabis breaking news, cannabis constitutional challenge, cannabis federal court case, cannabis industry attorney, cannabis industry legal risk, cannabis investors, cannabis legal challenge, cannabis psychiatric injury, cannabis psychosis risk, cannabis public health concerns, cannabis regulatory challenge, cannabis rescheduling, cannabis rescheduling lawsuit, cannabis Schedule III reversal, cannabis standing challenge, cannabis stock risk, cannabis treaty compliance, Controlled Substances Act marijuana, D.C. Circuit marijuana case, DALES REPORT, DEA, DEA hearing June 2026, DEA marijuana rescheduling, DEA rulemaking, Department of Justice marijuana order, Duane Boise, FDA, federal appeals court marijuana case, federal cannabis litigation, federal cannabis reform, federal marijuana appeal, federal marijuana law, Harris Sliwoski cannabis law, Harvard neuroscientist marijuana, Jason Adelstone, marijuana administrative law, marijuana court review, marijuana emergency room visits, MARIJUANA FAKE NEWS, marijuana federal policy, marijuana industry attorney, marijuana industry litigation, marijuana industry news, marijuana investors, marijuana public health debate, marijuana rescheduling, marijuana rescheduling appeal, marijuana rescheduling challenge, marijuana rescheduling hearing, marijuana rescheduling lawsuit, marijuana rescheduling reversal, marijuana rescheduling standing, marijuana rescheduling stay motion, marijuana rulemaking challenge, marijuana Schedule III rule, marijuana science and policy., marijuana stock risk, marijuana suicide risk, marijuana treaty obligations, marijuana youth mental health, MMJ BioPharma, MMJ International Holdings, NDASA lawsuit, NORML v DEA, PRES TRUMP MARIJUANA, Schedule III cannabis, Schedule III marijuana, Terry Cole